Logo site TopDissertations
+
Order Now
Logo site TopDissertations

Use the PRISMA 2020 checklist and flow diagram to plan, document, and report a systematic literature review (SLR) in your dissertation. Follow the four‑phase workflow – identification, screening, eligibility, inclusion – and record each step in a PRISMA flowchart. Download the ready‑made template at the end of this guide.

Why a Systematic Review?

A systematic review offers a transparent, reproducible way to synthesize existing research. For a dissertation it:

  • Demonstrates scholarly rigour – you follow an internationally recognised standard.
  • Identifies gaps – the structured search reveals what has not been studied.
  • Builds a solid theoretical foundation – your own contribution is anchored in a comprehensive evidence base.

The PRISMA Framework

PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta‑Analyses) provides:

  1. 27‑item checklist covering title, objectives, eligibility criteria, search strategy, risk of bias, synthesis methods, and more.
  2. Flow diagram that visualises the number of records at each stage.

PRISMA Checklist Highlights for Dissertations

Section What to Include
Title Identify the review as systematic and state the model (e.g., PRISMA 2020).
Eligibility criteria Define population, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) and study design limits.
Information sources List databases (Scopus, Web of Science, ProQuest) and date of last search.
Search strategy Provide full Boolean strings for each database as an appendix.
Risk of bias Choose a tool (e.g., CASP, ROBIS) and summarise assessment.
Synthesis Explain whether you will perform a narrative synthesis or meta‑analysis.
Registration Optionally register the protocol on OSF or PROSPERO.

Four‑Phase Workflow

  1. Identification – Run comprehensive searches across multiple databases and grey‑literature sources. Export results to a reference manager (Zotero, EndNote).
  2. Screening – Remove duplicates, then screen titles/abstracts against inclusion criteria.
  3. Eligibility – Retrieve full texts and assess them for relevance and quality.
  4. Inclusion – Finalise the list of studies and extract data.

Practical Tips

  • Automate de‑duplication with Zotero’s duplicate detection plugin.
  • Document each step in a spreadsheet (author, year, design, key findings).
  • Save the PRISMA flow diagram as an image (use the official template from the PRISMA website).

Templates & Resources

Common Pitfalls & How to Avoid Them

Pitfall Solution
Over‑broad search strings → thousands of irrelevant records Use specific keywords, Boolean operators, and limit by discipline and year.
Ignoring grey literature → bias toward published studies Search conference proceedings, theses repositories (ProQuest Dissertations), and pre‑print servers.
Inconsistent data extraction Create a standard extraction form and pilot it on three studies.
Missing PRISMA items Run the checklist before writing the chapter; treat it as a manuscript‑ready quality control.

Decision Framework: When to Use PRISMA

  • Use PRISMA if your literature review aims to systematically map all relevant empirical studies.
  • Opt for a traditional narrative review when the field is too nascent for systematic coverage or when you need a broad theoretical overview instead of exhaustive evidence.

Final Checklist Before Submission

  • [ ] PRISMA checklist completed and attached as Appendix A.
  • [ ] Flow diagram generated and placed in Chapter 2.
  • [ ] All database search strings saved in a separate document.
  • [ ] Risk‑of‑bias assessments summarised in a table.
  • [ ] References formatted according to your university’s style guide.

CTA: Need help structuring your systematic review? Contact our Dissertation Writing Service for one‑on‑one guidance and a custom PRISMA template.